September 2, 2008

unFound exhibition 2008

Some of you may already know that I've been working on a poetry/visual art installation for the past year or so. I'm pleased to announce that unFound will actually open this weekend, Friday, Sept. 5th, in Stockton, CA.

I'm excited that we actually get to do the "work" that we do -- it's easy (sometimes) to imagine and dream about artsy and poetic stuff. But to actually get the ideas out of our heads, off the ground (and the written page) and onto the walls, and to show it to the public, well, it's really incredible.

I have never primed and painted so many shoes in my life!

This Friday, I'll be heading to Stockton with agkk. The opening reception and reading will be on Friday at 7:30 p.m., and on Saturday, we'll have the workshops.

It will be a long road ahead, but I'm looking forward to it!

Check it out, folks. It really is legitimate!

August 31, 2008

How to Make Chocolate Stains Disappear

As promised early last week, here is this week's installment of the all-amazing Chocolate: The Consuming Passion, my new favorite book.

Our excerpt this week shows us how to remove chocolate stains -- that is, IF you actually have any chocolate left over to stain your clothes after you scarf it down in the midst of polite society...

Now folks, please remember that this book is not for everyone. Like Boynton said, this book is not "for those who cannot remember the last time they had chocolate, or who cannot anticipate within a reasonable time (three seconds) when the next occasion will be" (11). It is for the "chocolate elite", for those of us to live and breathe chocolate, for those of us who just might dream of chocolate and who dream not in color or b&w but in chocolate.

Removal of Chocolate from Porous Materials:
  1. Scrape off excess chocolate with your fingernail (in polite society, use a demitasse spoon)
  2. Apply cornstarch -- to absorb oils
  3. Apply cleaning fluid; let dry
  4. Wet fabric again and apply enzyme paste. Let stand 2 hours
  5. Remove paste using spatula or gloves.
  6. Wash fabric with water and detergent.

If Stain Persists
  1. Apply few drops ammonia
  2. Neutralize with few drops vinegar
  3. Wash fabric again. The stain -- and perhaps the place where it was -- will be gone.

Alternate Method of Stain Obliteration
  1. Melt 1/4 pound chocolate for each pound of fabric
  2. Immerse fabric in chocolate and let stand
  3. Rinse well

Removal of Chocolate from Non-porous Material
These spots are easily licked


- Taken from Chocolate: The Consuming Passion, written, illustrated, and over-researched by Sandra Boynton

August 29, 2008

Draft-Dodging in the Culture War?

The following is an article that I read in the newsletter of CLGS at the Graduate Theological Union. When I think about what it means for me to be an Ally for my LGBT friends, I realize that it is my responsibility as a Christian and an ally to speak up against the perpetuation of language usage that attacks human beings who are created in the image of God. As Jay says here:


"I cannot sit idly by while the Gospel is once again used as an excuse for unfairness and bigotry. I cannot remain silent while so many believe that Donald Wildmon and Chuck Colson speak for Christians everywhere. I can't just hope for the best; I have to do something before religion as a whole and not just Christianity is painted with those same distorted, violent messages."


Yet, it is not easy, because often times, while I feel strongly about supporting my friends, I don't know how -- I am lost in the midst of a culture war. Language loss. And it is partly because I've grown accustomed to hearing harsh words. And it is partly because I dont' want to merely re-iterate the antonyms and oppositional words without really understanding what I stand for. I hope that over time I will learn how to wield words that build up and construct, words that empower and celebrate, instead of words that attack and tear down.

Copied here for your perusal are the words of Jay Johnson:

I've grown accustomed to words like "effort," "struggle," and "contest," which seem part of my daily routine. But the rhetoric keeps escalating and the words have shifted - "fight," "battle," "war," and even "Armageddon" now fill the landscape. If it weren't so dangerous, it might be funny. I'm not referring here to the Middle East or the geo-politics of the former Soviet Union; I'm talking about marriage, which is no longer apparently about love but armed conflict.

How odd to feel the need to be explicit about this, but apparently more of us need to: The loving and committed lesbian and gay couples I know aren't planning to overthrow the government and they're not stock-piling weapons of mass destruction. They just want to get married. Some of them just want to live out their God-given vocation to ordained ministry. All of us want religious hate-speech to stop before another life is lost to religious hate-crimes (the July 27 shooting at a Tennessee Unitarian Universalist Church is just the latest example: http://www.uua.org/news/knoxville/index.shtml

Meanwhile, here in California money is pouring in from around the country to support the anti-marriage constitutional amendment on the November ballot. Donald Wildmon, founder of the American Family Association, recently made this dire prediction: "If we lose California, if they defeat the marriage amendment, I'm afraid that the culture war is over and Christians have lost." More severely, Chuck Colson described the November ballot initiative as "the Armageddon in the culture war." During a July 30 strategy session, other religious leaders in favor of the amendment spoke of raising up an "army" of believers, putting "soldiers on the street," and being on the "front lines of a battle." One went so far as to call a planned rally right before the election a "blitzkrieg moment."

Do they realize the historical horrors they are evoking with those images? Frankly, that kind of rhetoric takes my breath away. Of course, there's nothing new about mingling religious and militaristic language, but it's no less dangerous for being traditional. I can't help but feel like I'm walking around with a bull's eye painted on my chest, or like fodder for religious target practice. At the very least, something has gone terribly wrong when declarations of love become the occasion for a declaration of war.

As a Christian, I am quite simply embarrassed by all this and deeply troubled. In the service I try to offer as an ordained minister, I seek to follow the Jesus I read about in the Gospels, who urges only the love of God and the love of neighbor as one's self as the essence of faith. That's the same Jesus who announces the coming realm of God with images of partying with feasts and celebrating at banquets (presumably with one's guns and ammunition checked at the door). By pursuing ordination in the Episcopal Church, I didn't sign up to be a religious "soldier" and I refuse to be drafted in a culture war that turns churches into battlefields and talks about prayer like an armed skirmish.

I didn't then and I won't sign up now for violence, not even of "just" the rhetorical variety. But I won't stay on the sidelines, either. There's far too much at stake here. A recent article in the Los Angeles Times (Aug. 24) quotes political analysts who believe that the inter-religious alliances currently forming against same-gender marriage could herald new ways of building political coalitions. At present, the strongest religious voices in that effort come from Mormons, Roman Catholics, and evangelical Christians. But they are also reaching out to Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, and Hindus.

I cannot sit idly by while the Gospel is once again used as an excuse for unfairness and bigotry. I cannot remain silent while so many believe that Donald Wildmon and Chuck Colson speak for Christians everywhere. I can't just hope for the best; I have to do something before religion as a whole and not just Christianity is painted with those same distorted, violent messages. That's why I work for CLGS.

All of us at CLGS work hard to provide the latest resources and the best education and training possible at the intersection of sexuality and religion. As you'll see in this issue of our e-newsletter, the 2008-09 programming year is overflowing with opportunities, both here on the PSR campus and around the country. Among them are not-to-be-missed marriage equality events.

But these many programs and projects are not "weapons" and we're not marshalling any armies. At CLGS we're committed to the justice-making, peace-loving prophetic witness our religious traditions call on us to make. Of course, we're not naïve about those who would oppose our work. We know first-hand and are reminded every day that we are indeed engaged in a struggle - for some, that struggle is quite literally a matter of life and death. We know that the change we seek to inspire and to live will not happen overnight and we know that we can't do this work alone; we need your help.

Simply put, both here in Berkeley and in our expanding work in locations around the country, we need your time and we need your generous donations of money. We won't be issuing handguns to our volunteers and we're not trying to endow a "war chest." We are instead committed to equipping scholars, faith communities, and activists with the tools they need to transform a society of injustice and violence into thriving communities of safety and equality for all God's children.

Perhaps, like me, you're wondering whether it's time to dust off that old mantra from the 1960s: "Make love, not war." Perhaps, like me, you're committed to the biblical vision found in the prophet Isaiah, a vision of God's own mountain where swords are beaten into ploughshares. If, like me, you believe this world has had far too much of war, whether economic, political, or cultural, then I hope you'll join me in supporting our work at CLGS. The time for warfare is over; the time has come for love, fairness, equality, and justice. With your help, we can make that vision a reality.

The Rev. Jay E. Johnson, PhD Senior Director, Academic Research & Resources

August 26, 2008

Painting shoes & loving it

We are two weeks from the opening of our poetry/visual art exhibit. Today, I'm priming & painting shoes. Tomorrow, I will dye fabric in the washer and will try not to destroy it in the process.

August 25, 2008

Update on the Millennium Development Goals

The following is the foreword written by Secretary General Kofi A. Annan in the 2005 Millennium Development Goals Report. I highlight them here even though this was written three years ago; I do so with the desire of reminding myself, and you, of the desperate need for all of us to think of whatever ways we can possibly help achieve these goals. We will not enjoy security in our American homes (whether in the midwest or on the West coast or in the humid regions of the south) if we do not have development, and we cannot achieve and sustain development if we do not respect human rights -- for everyone. What have you done to reach the development goals?


NOTE: The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are the world’s time-bound
and quantified targets for addressing extreme poverty in its many dimensions—
income poverty, hunger, disease, lack of adequate shelter, and exclusion—
while promoting gender equality, education, and environmental sustainability.
They are also basic human rights—the rights of each person on the
planet to health, education, shelter, and security as pledged in the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Millennium Declaration.

How will the world look in 2015 if the Goals are achieved? More than
500 million people will be lifted out of extreme poverty. More than 300 million
will no longer suffer from hunger. There will also be dramatic progress in
child health. Rather than die before reaching their fifth birthdays, 30 million
children will be saved. So will the lives of more than 2 million mothers.

There’s more. Achieving the Goals will mean 350 million fewer people
are without safe drinking water and 650 million fewer people live without
the benefits of basic sanitation, allowing them to lead healthier and more
dignified lives. Hundreds of millions more women and girls will go to school,
access economic and political opportunity, and have greater security and
safety.


THE ADOPTION OF THE Millennium Development
Goals, drawn from the United Nations Millennium
Declaration, was a seminal event in the history of the
United Nations. It constituted an unprecedented
promise by world leaders to address, as a single package,
peace, security, development, human rights and
fundamental freedoms.

As I said in my March 2005 report entitled
“In larger freedom: towards development,
security and human rights for all”, to which
the present report is a complement:

“We will not enjoy development without security, we will not enjoy security without development, and we will not enjoy either without respect for human rights. Unless all these causes are advanced, none will succeed.”

The eight Millennium Development Goals range
from halving extreme poverty to halting the spread
of HIV/AIDS and providing universal primary education
— all by the target date of 2015. They form a
blueprint agreed by all the world’s countries and all the
world’s leading development institutions — a set of
simple but powerful objectives that every man and
woman in the street, from New York to Nairobi to New
Delhi, can easily support and understand. Since their
adoption, the Goals have galvanized unprecedented
efforts to meet the needs of the world’s poorest.

Why are the Millennium Development Goals so
different? There are four reasons.

First, the Millennium Development Goals are
people-centred, time-bound and measurable.
Second, they are based on a global partnership,
stressing the responsibilities of developing countries
for getting their own house in order, and of developed
countries for supporting those efforts.
Third, they have unprecedented political support,
embraced at the highest levels by developed and
developing countries, civil society and major development
institutions alike. Fourth, they are achievable.


The year 2005 is crucial in our work to achieve
the Goals. In September — 5 years after they adopted
the Millennium Declaration and 10 years before the
Goals fall due — world leaders will meet at the
United Nations in New York to assess how far their
pledges have been fulfilled, and to decide on what
further steps are needed. In many ways, the task this
year will be much tougher than it was in 2000.
Instead of setting targets, this time leaders must
decide how to achieve them.

THIS PROGRESS REPORT is the most comprehensive
accounting to date on how far we have come,
and how far we have to go, in each of the world’s
regions. It reflects a collaborative effort among a large
number of agencies and organizations within and
outside the United Nations system. All have provided
the most up-to-date data possible in their areas of
responsibility, helping thereby to achieve clarity and
consistency in the report.

Above all, the report shows us how much progress
has been made in some areas, and how large an effort
is needed to meet the Millennium Development Goals
in others. If current trends persist, there is a risk that
many of the poorest countries will not be able to
meet many of them. Considering how far we have
come, such a failure would mark a tragically missed
opportunity. This report shows that we have the
means at hand to ensure that nearly every country
can make good on the promises of the Goals. Our
challenge is to deploy those means.

As I said in my March report: “Let us be clear
about the costs of missing this opportunity: millions
of lives that could have been saved will be lost; many
freedoms that could have been secured will be
denied; and we shall inhabit a more dangerous
and unstable world.”

I commend this report as a key resource in preparing
for the September summit, which must be a time
of decision. The analysis and information contained
here can help citizens, civic organizations,
Governments, parliaments and international bodies
to play their respective roles in making the
Millennium Development Goals a reality.